Progut - Leading the way to natural animal gut health
Main pageCompanyProductsResearch and trialsDosage ratesDistribution networkContactSite map

Research and Trials

Main page > Research and Trials > Poultry > Agrifood Research Center, Finland, 2002

Agrifood Research Center, Finland, 2002

 

Broiler trial at Agrifood Research Center in Finland, 2002

 

At the beginning of the trial 3900 Ross 508 chickens were divided into 48 pens, cocks and hens separately. The trial design was 2*2*2*2 factorial and the factors were; sex, vaccination vs. coccidiostat, ProgutTM0 vs. 0,2 % and corn-based vs. wheat-based starter diet. Feeds were wheat or corn based, containing also barley, soya, vegetable oil, amino acids, minerals and premixes. All the diets contained Avizyme and Betafin. Starter feeds were given until day 10 and after that birds were fed with grower feeds. Birds were weighed by pen at the beginning of the trial, on day 10, 21 and also at the end of the trial. Feed consumption was measured per pen.

 

 

Results

 

The crude protein content of the corn based starter feed with ProgutTM was lower than in other starter feeds (25,4% vs. 26,8%). That may have had an effect on the results. In other feeds the analyzed feed composition didn't differ from the calculated. Feeds containing ProgutTMsignificantly improved (p<0,05) the growth of broilers during the growing period and during the whole trial period (see table below). ProgutTM also improved the growth of birds fed with wheat-based starter feeds during the starter period. It may have happened also with corn-based starter feed without differences in the crude protein content. Vaccination or the raw material basis in starter feed didn't have effect on growth. It seemed that cocks were generally growing better than hens.

 

Vaccination, ProgutTM or the raw material composition of starter feed didn't effect on feed conversion ratio during the whole trial period. Feeds containing ProgutTM tended to improve feed conversion ratio in vaccinated birds after starter feed period. The same was not seen with coccidiostat feeds.

 

 

Progut + Progut - P
Weight, g:
- Day 1 38 38
- Day 10 2459 239
- Day 21 871 859
- Day 36 2189 2146 0.023
Feed per gain kg/kg:
1 - 10 days (per kg live weight) 1.09 1.05 0.004
11 -21 days 1.4 1.42 0.07
22 - 36 days 1.75 1.76 0.42
1 - 36 days 1.57 1.58 0.27
Feed kg/kg carcass weight 2.22 2.25 0.121
Mortality, % 1 - 36 days 4.5 5.9

THE EFFECT OF PROGUTTM ON BROILER PERFORMANCE

 

*) Crude protein in starter feeds different than calculated

Wheat-based starter feed increased gut viscosity on day 9 in comparison with corn-based starter feed. Other treatments didn't have effect on gut viscosity. ProgutTM feeds increased the share of breast meat from live weight of vaccinated birds. Litter dry matter didn't differ significantly among the treatments. It seems that Progut had bigger effect on growth and feed conversion with vaccinated birds (see table below).

 

 

Coccidiostat Vaccination
Averages Progut + Progut - Progut + Progut -
Weight, g:
- Day 1 38 38 38 38
- Day 10 251 239 230 239
- Day 36 2185 2154 2192 2139
Feed per gain, kg/kg
1 - 10 days 1.04 1.05 1.14 1.07
1 - 36 days 1.57 1.57 1.56 1.58
Feed kg/kg carcass weight: 2.22 2.23 2.22 2.27
Mortality, % 1 - 36 days 4.8 5.4 4.2 6.4

THE EFFECT OF PROGUTTM ON THE PERFOMANCE OF VACCINATED OR COCCIDIOSTAT FED BROILERS

* Crude protein content of the corn based starter feed with Progut was lower than in other starter feeds (25,4% vs. 26,8%).

 

Archive

Suomen Rehu