Progut - Leading the way to natural animal gut health
Main pageCompanyProductsResearch and trialsDosage ratesDistribution networkContactSite map

Research and Trials

Main page > Research and Trials > Poultry > Vilnius Broiler Farm, Lithuania, 2003

Vilnius Broiler Farm, Lithuania, 2003

 

Broiler trial at Vilnius Broiler Farm, Lithuania 2003

 

The trial was conducted by the Lithuanian Veterinary Academy and carried out at Vilnius broiler farm with 600 Cobb broiler chickens (1 – 35 days of age). The birds were divided into 2 groups, 3*100 birds in both groups. The broilers were kept on a deep litter in separate pens, and were provided water from stationary watering containers. Both groups were fed with crumbled - pelleted feed ad libitum. The trial feed contained 0,15 % ProgutTM. The diets were typical broiler diets based on wheat and corn. The broilers were slaughtered at 35 days of age and pH measurement from duodenum, caecum and large intestine samples was performed. The number of lactic acid bacterium as well as coliformic bacteria in duodenum (duodenum), in blind bags (caecum) and in the large intestine (intestinum crassum) was measured.

 

The performance results of the experiment are shown in the table below. Feeds containing ProgutTM resulted in a slight improvement in production performance.

 

 

Group Control Group Experimental Group**
Age, d Weight (g/broiler)
1 45.59±0.34 45.60±0.35
8 138.90±1.50 137.70±1.30
21 746.80±7.00 728.90±7.10
35 1902.66±13.60 1917.80±12.81
Feed conversion ratio (kg feed/kg weight gain)
1 - 8 1.29±0.04 1.29±0.08
9 - 12 1.44±0.01 1.44±0.01
22 - 35 1.81±0.04 1.77±0.03
1 - 35 1.62±0.03 1.61±0.02
Mortality %
1 - 8 0.67 0.33
9 - 21 1.00 0.34
22 - 35 1.34 0.67
1 - 35 3.01 1.34

THE EFFECT OF PROGUTTM ON THE PRODUCTIVITY OF BROILER CHICKENS

**PROGUTTM 0.15%

 

The weight of 35-day-old broilers was 1.0 % higher and feed conversion ratio 1 % lower compared with the control group. Mortality in the trial group was 37 % lower (1,68 vs. 2,68 %) compared with the control group.ProgutTMdecreased pH (p<0,05) in caecum and large intestine (see table below).

 

 

Control Group Experimental Group*
pH
Duodenum 5.29±0.15 5.58±0.19
Blind Bags 6.29±0.08 5.90±0.14**
Large intest. 6.19±0.26 5.82±0.20**

PH IN DUODENUM, CAECUM AND LARGE INTESTINE OF BROILERS

*Progut 0.15%

**Statistically significant differences (p<0.05)

 

The number of lactobacilli in the caecum and in large intestine in experimental group was higher and the number of coliforms lower than in the control group (see table below).

 

 

Control Group Experimental Group
Lactobacilli units/g
Duodenum 0.12 106 ± 0.17 105 0.96 105 ± 0.19 105
Blind Bags 1.98 106 ± 0.11 106 3.01 106 ± 0.18 106**
Large Intestine 1.67 106 ± 0.78 105 1.79 106 ± 0.16 106**
Coliformic units/g
Duodenum 0.32 105 ± 0.59 104 1.65 106 ± 0.16 106**
Blind Bags 53.03 106 ± 4.20 106 25.32 106 ± 1.15 106**
Large Intestine 19.45 106 ± 0.46 106 11.79 106 ± 0.30 106**

RESULTS FROM MICROBIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS

* ProgutTM 0.15%

**Statistically significant differences (p<0.05)

Archive

Suomen Rehu