|
Main page >
Research and Trials >
Poultry >
Vilnius Broiler Farm, Lithuania, 2003
|
Vilnius Broiler Farm, Lithuania, 2003
|
Broiler trial at Vilnius Broiler Farm, Lithuania
2003
The trial was conducted by the Lithuanian Veterinary Academy
and carried out at Vilnius broiler farm with 600 Cobb broiler chickens (1 – 35 days of age). The birds were
divided into 2 groups, 3*100 birds in both groups. The broilers were kept on a deep litter in separate pens, and were
provided water from stationary watering containers. Both groups were fed with crumbled - pelleted feed ad libitum. The
trial feed contained 0,15 % ProgutTM. The diets were typical broiler diets based on wheat and corn. The
broilers were slaughtered at 35 days of age and pH measurement from duodenum, caecum and large intestine samples
was performed. The number of lactic acid bacterium as well as coliformic bacteria in duodenum (duodenum), in
blind bags (caecum) and in the large intestine (intestinum crassum) was measured.
The performance results of the experiment are shown in the
table below. Feeds containing ProgutTM resulted in a slight improvement in production
performance.
| Group |
Control Group |
Experimental
Group** |
| Age, d |
Weight
(g/broiler) |
| 1 |
45.59±0.34 |
45.60±0.35 |
| 8 |
138.90±1.50 |
137.70±1.30 |
| 21 |
746.80±7.00 |
728.90±7.10 |
| 35 |
1902.66±13.60 |
1917.80±12.81 |
| Feed conversion
ratio (kg feed/kg weight gain) |
| 1 - 8 |
1.29±0.04 |
1.29±0.08 |
| 9 - 12 |
1.44±0.01 |
1.44±0.01 |
| 22 - 35 |
1.81±0.04 |
1.77±0.03 |
| 1 - 35 |
1.62±0.03 |
1.61±0.02 |
| Mortality
% |
| 1 - 8 |
0.67 |
0.33 |
| 9 - 21 |
1.00 |
0.34 |
| 22 - 35 |
1.34 |
0.67 |
| 1 - 35 |
3.01 |
1.34 |
THE EFFECT OF PROGUTTM ON THE PRODUCTIVITY OF
BROILER CHICKENS
**PROGUTTM 0.15%
The weight of 35-day-old broilers was 1.0 % higher and feed
conversion ratio 1 % lower compared with the control group. Mortality in the trial group was 37 % lower (1,68 vs. 2,68
%) compared with the control group.ProgutTMdecreased pH (p<0,05) in caecum and large intestine (see table
below).
|
Control Group |
Experimental
Group* |
| pH |
| Duodenum |
5.29±0.15 |
5.58±0.19 |
| Blind Bags |
6.29±0.08 |
5.90±0.14** |
| Large intest. |
6.19±0.26 |
5.82±0.20** |
PH IN DUODENUM, CAECUM AND LARGE INTESTINE OF
BROILERS
*Progut 0.15%
**Statistically significant differences
(p<0.05)
The number of lactobacilli in the caecum and in large
intestine in experimental group was higher and the number of coliforms lower than in the control group (see table
below).
|
Control Group |
Experimental Group |
|
Lactobacilli units/g |
| Duodenum |
0.12 106 ± 0.17
105 |
0.96 105 ± 0.19
105 |
| Blind Bags |
1.98 106 ± 0.11
106 |
3.01 106 ± 0.18
106** |
| Large Intestine |
1.67 106 ± 0.78
105 |
1.79 106 ± 0.16
106** |
| Coliformic units/g |
| Duodenum |
0.32 105 ± 0.59
104 |
1.65 106 ± 0.16
106** |
| Blind Bags |
53.03 106 ±
4.20 106 |
25.32 106 ±
1.15 106** |
| Large Intestine |
19.45 106 ±
0.46 106 |
11.79 106 ±
0.30 106** |
RESULTS FROM MICROBIOLOGICAL ANALYSIS
* ProgutTM 0.15%
**Statistically significant differences
(p<0.05)
|