|
Main page >
News archive >
Progut® Info Letter 2/2009
|
|
Progut® Info Letter 2/2009
|
14.11.2009
The effect of Progut®on the recovery from chronic enteritis in laying hens. Schothorst Feed Research
2008.
Modified from the original report by Juhani
Vuorenmaa
1. Background
The chronic enteritis syndrome in laying hens is
characterized as extremely high feed intake, loss of feathers, low peak production, moderate laying rate, poor body
condition and high mortality. Although the problem is reported by a high number of farms, the exact cause for it is
still unknown. It is suggested that certain stressors, like transport of hens from rearing to laying farms, increase
the risk for chronic enteritis. Stressors can induce inflammation in the intestines thus increasing the risk for
secondary bacterial infections like Clostridium perfringens. Chronic enteritis is usually reported in
alternative housing systems where hens do have regular contact with litter and faeces. The recovery from the infection
increases the need for specific nutrients for the immune response and recovery and fewer nutrients are available for
growth and egg production. It is suggested that the hen is initially trying to compensate the higher nutrient need by
increasing the daily feed intake but eventually failing. As a consequence the hen is losing its body condition, weight,
feathers, reducing egg production and finally dies. It has been calculated that the loss of profit could add up to
€ 2 per hen depending on the severity of the infection.
2. Objective
The purpose of the trial was to study the effect of
Progut®on the recovery from chronic enteritis in laying hens.
3. Materials and methods
The trial was conducted by Schothorst Feed Research in the
Netherlands in 2008. Alternatively housed brown layers suffering from chronic enteritis were selected from five
commercial farms and transported to the trial farm. A total of 315 laying hens were allotted to three different
treatments as a part of a bigger trial (Table 1). Each treatment consisted of a floor pen with 21 laying hens. Hens
were housed on litter originating from the laying hen farm with exception of treatment 3. These hens were housed on a
clean litter. All treatments were replicated in time with five different flocks and each replicate lasted six
weeks.
Table 1. Description of the treatments
| Treatment |
Description |
| 1 |
Basal corn
&wheat |
| 2 |
As 1 + Progut 0,2
% |
| 3 |
As 1 + clean
litter |
After arrival to the trial farm, the birds were weighed to set a
start weight per treatment. The hens were also weighted at day 7, 14, 21 and 28 (10 individual, randomly chosen hens).
At day 35, the remaining hens were weighed. Feed and water were available ad libitum. Weekly feed intake, laying
rate, egg weight and egg mass were measured per treatment. Feed conversion ratio was calculated per week and
treatment.
At arrival, 21 animals were sent for post-mortem examinations
in order to determine a zero value of each flock at the start of the experiment. All animals were investigated on
general health indicators, like possible disease and infections. After this macroscopic observation, five productive
and flock representative animals were selected for microscopic observations. The same activities were repeated at day
14, 21, 28 and 35 using four animals per treatment to indicate differences in time. A macroscopic post-mortem
examination was also performed for animals that died during the experiment or were euthanized because of health
problems. At the last day of the experimental period the remaining hens per treatment (max. 5) were sacrificed and
examined.
Duodenum samples were collected at different time points and
the three most representative samples were selected for histological evaluation. The following parameters were measured
from the duodenum samples in HE coloured freeze coupes.
Villus height and crypt depth
Villus length[S1] and crypt depth of five representative villus and crypt per bird
were measured. Birds suffering from chronic enteritis are in constant mode of intestinal inflammation and recovery. Due
to the acute inflammation, the villus length can vary and is often shortened. The number of active cells for cell
division in the crypt will increase. This will result in increased crypt depth and higher cell renewal which can be
expressed by the number of mitoses per crypt.
Number of mitoses per crypt
The number of cells in division per crypt for six
representative crypts per bird was counted. Active cell division indicates higher turn-over of the crypt cells.
Determination of the active cell division at weeks 2 and 6 of the trial indicates the effects of the treatments on the
recovery from chronic enteritis.
Infiltrate inflammation cells
The presence of inflammatory cells was scored in the lamina
propria mucosa of the intestine of each duodenum sample. The number of inflammatory cells indicates the severity of the
inflammation.
The data was evaluated statistically by analysis of variance
using Genstat statistical software. Treatments were compared based on the least significant differences. Effects with P
< 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.
4. Results
One flock was a clear outlier and was therefore deleted from
the dataset prior to the final statistical analysis.
The results from the first flock illustrated well the
recovery process of laying hens from chronic enteritis. In this flock the feed intake of the hens increased from 136 to
168 g/d by the fifth week in the trial and stabilised thereafter (table 1). The laying rate and egg mass showed a
similar trend. It was therefore concluded that the high nutrient intake indicates recovery phase from chronic
enteritis. This was shown by increased body weight and egg production. The hens first need a higher nutrient intake to
recover. Subsequently, the feed intake and egg production will normalise.
Table 1. The performance of the first flock during the trial
period
| Week |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
| Feed intake g |
136 |
146 |
160 |
165 |
168 |
160 |
| Laying rate % |
76,1 |
78,4 |
86,1 |
87,1 |
90,7 |
86,3 |
| Egg mass g |
48,7 |
50,6 |
56,0 |
56,7 |
59,4 |
56,5 |
| FCR kg/kg |
2,802 |
2,895 |
2,859 |
2,913 |
2,846 |
2,880 |
| Body weight g |
1726 |
1691 |
1784 |
1834 |
1849 |
1857 |
Progut treatment showed the highest feed intake and production
performance as an average over the 6 week trial period (table 2). The differences were numerically or significantly
higher than the control treatment 1 (own litter) and 3 (clean litter). Hen weight was also highest in the Progut
treatment. Feed intake was on average 123 g/d at the start of the experiment. It increased rapidly to over 150 g/d and
was maintained at this level until the end of the trial. Laying rate, egg mass and body weight followed a similar
trend. The average of all trial groups for laying rate, egg mass and body weight at week 1 and 6 are presented in table
2.
Table 2. The performance parameters during the
trial
| Feed |
Feed intake
g/d |
Laying rate
% |
Egg mass
g |
FCR
kg/kg |
Hen weight
g |
Control 1
basal |
142,2a |
83,1a |
53,1a |
2,681a |
1826b |
| Progut |
146,3a |
83,3a |
53,4a |
2,739a |
1871a |
Control 3
clean litter |
137,4a |
77,6b |
51,1a |
2,751a |
1808b |
| Week 1 |
123,1 |
73,5 |
46,9 |
2,661 |
1828 |
| Week 6 |
155,6 |
88,6 |
57,0 |
2,757 |
1850 |
The results from the histological measurements showed increased
villus / crypt ratio from 2 to 6 weeks of the trial, which was mainly due to reduced crypt depth (table 3). The villus
length was not affected. In addition, the number of mitoses per crypt was decreased but the severity of the infiltrate
cells was not changed in time. The results indicate improvement of intestinal health during the trial.
The crypt depth in the Progut treatment was intermediate to
the control treatments suggesting low cell turnover (table 3). This was supported by the lowest number of mitoses in
the crypt cells, although the differences weren’t statistically significant. Severity of the inflammation cells
in the Progut treatment was numerically lower than the control 1 (basal feed) but higher than the control 3 (clean
litter). All these parameters are indicating recovery of the small intestine in the Progut treatment. However, the
villus length was lowest in the Progut treatment which was contradictory to the other histological parameters. It may
be that the lower cell renewal activities in the crypt have resulted in shorter villi.
Table 3. Histological parameters in different
treatments
|
Villus
length |
Crypt
depth |
# mitoses per
crypt |
Severity of
the inflammation cells |
| Week
2 |
1739 |
280a |
2,38a |
1,20 |
| Week
6 |
1749 |
234b |
1,96b |
1,21 |
| Control
1 |
1778a |
275a |
2,22 |
1,46a |
| Progut |
1630b |
247ab |
1,91 |
1,21ab |
| Control
3 |
1740a |
222b |
2,15 |
1,08b |
5. Conclusions
- High
nutrient intake and as a consequence increased body weight and egg production were indicators of a recovery phase from
chronic enteritis
-
Progut treatment showed the highest feed intake, body weight and production performance over the trial
period
- The
differences were numerically or significantly higher than the control treatments
- The
supporting data from the histological analysis indicated lower cell turnover and inflammation based on crypt depth,
number of mitoses per crypt and severity of the inflammation cells
-
However, the villus length was lowest in the Progut treatment which is a contradictory finding to other histological
parameters measured. The reason for the lower villus length remained unclear
-
Progut addition alleviated chronic enteritis based on improved performance parameters. The effects on production
performance were partially supported by the effects on histological parameters
|